Defending Monogamy :
(begin: Wed Shevat 15, 5775 08:48PDT)
ABC's GMA did a segment this morning about monogamy. It included a survey of those who think social media may have an impact on monogamous relationships. Fifty-seven percent of responders think so.
In the real world, the sanctity of marriage is defined by defending monogamy. It is the foundation of marriage, and Marriage Equality for we Gays must include the same definition, or we are not seeking Equality at all, but some form of "special equality," or "more equality," and there is no such thing.
I have defined, repeatedly, how monogamy, regardless of spelling, is a key-component in defending we Gays from the asymmetrical warfare waged against us. Now, this is important, pay attention: in the rural areas, a Gay's "one and only" often comes from the cities, not always but often. What they know of that individual is what they are told. And oftentimes that individual is living a double-life, cowering behind a woman in a closet of deception, lying and cheating; when they are 'done' with their same-sex "encounter," they return to their closet-of-deception, cowering behind their 'woman.' The lies they told their "straight friends," are the lies they told their "gay friend(s)." Perhaps different words, different types of excuses, but lies nonetheless.
Rural Gays are often accused of "seducing married men." The reverse is usually the case. Further, the liar and cheater, when their closet-of-deception is 'stripped-away,' they make themselves-out as being "victims of their sexuality." Even if they become involved in a same-sex relationship, after they are divorced by the woman and kids they always lied to, they are not 'gay,' they are Bi-sexual. These are Bi-sexual issues, not 'gay-issues.' Gays were lied to, just like 'straights' (Str8s). And after the liar "comes out," they are still Bi-sexual, not Gay, and once the figurative daylight illuminates their dark deceptive closet and they 'confess,' they are not proving any form of "integrity," they only prove they never had any integrity whatsoever.
Meanwhile, the Rural Gay they lied to, monogamous, is told by their "love" that they are the "one and only," and trusting in that love, become POSITIVE, not just for STDs, but all the stresses and neurosis that goes-along with deception, including higher rates of drug and alcohol abuse and trauma. The Str8 women and family experience similar outcomes. That is the only "gay equality" most of the world knows.
That makes Gays more VULNERABLE, to stereotyping and bullying and gay-bashing and discrimination in employment, housing and finance.
The non-monogamous stood before G*d and Country, friends and family, and made a promise and a commitment. They lied to Church too, see. Gays didn't. We did no such thing. We need protections from the non-monogamous, from Bi-sexuals, from liars from cheaters, just like Str8-spouses, male or female.
Further, the non-monogamous, after proving to have developed only ONE real 'discipline,' i.e., lying and cheating, take that to work with them as well. They are the first to make-up an excuse on-the-fly; the first to take credit for someone else's accomplishments, the first to blame another, the first to ridicule and scorn in the pathetic attempt at making themselves-out as being "superior/supreme." They are so 'good' at it, they often rise-above their colleagues, having a lifetime of 'practice' in their closets-of-deception cowering behind women. This is why Commanding Officers are oftentimes dismissed if it becomes known they are engaged in affairs, because they proved lack of discipline in not upholding their commitments; they oftentimes abused their co-workers and employers making excuses (lies) and therefore deceiving colleagues and staff. Not always, but usually. Not every single one of 'em, but most. This is also why I was against the decision about a Lesbian who had an affair with a married 'str8-woman' that was in the news several years ago. I consider it to be a situation of "aiding and abetting the perpetration of lying and cheating while in uniform."
We need protections from such peoples' behaviors as that. They have their own unique problem-sets they chose. They had a choice. We did not. They need their own forms of 'services' and their own forms of 'outreach' and their own forms of 'counseling' and their own forms of 'defense,' but whatever that may be, it's not us. And they must stop hiding behind the GAY LABEL as their excuse, for every time there is such an incident, another hundred Gays and Lesbians are hated-out of equality.
Shalom and Amen.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395
1818 E. 16th Ave., Spokane, WA 99203
(end: 09:20PDT)
---------------------------------------
(1st effort to correct typos and spelling-errors, begin Thu Shevat 16, 5775 08:41PDT)
(My opinion is that if anybody reads my quickly-typed, freely-expressed thoughts, I trust their education-level to be sufficient to figure-out typos/spelling-errors without judgements, for unlike others, I do not think faking 'perfect' by using computer-enhanced software proves intelligence at all, just how fake a person truly is. Spell/typo 'corrections' complete at Thu Shevat 16, 5775 08:48PDT, total time: 7-mins; as for syntax, I didn't bother as same concept is applicable, as always)
---------------------------------------
A brief word about spelling:
1) I usually spell "monogamy" as "monogomy," because it does not include "game" at the end of it, as relationships are not "gamey" (wild) and/or have nothing to do with playing games except to the immature. It's my personal preference.
2) I usually spell "lie" in the plural as "lieing", which is technically "incorrect." It should be "lying," but when translated, it is transliterated as "to lay on the ground." A "lie" is an untruth, not a "nap."
3) Words that I do not think of, or use often, I misspell/mistype frequently. For example, the word that sounds like "onohmonopia" is not one I type/say very often and as a result, I spell/type it a number of different ways. The obvious intent is: (if I can think of the correct spelling or find it somewhere) "anomateopia" ?? okay, wrong, I'll look it up. Here: on·o·mat·o·poe·ia
(begin: Wed Shevat 15, 5775 08:48PDT)
ABC's GMA did a segment this morning about monogamy. It included a survey of those who think social media may have an impact on monogamous relationships. Fifty-seven percent of responders think so.
In the real world, the sanctity of marriage is defined by defending monogamy. It is the foundation of marriage, and Marriage Equality for we Gays must include the same definition, or we are not seeking Equality at all, but some form of "special equality," or "more equality," and there is no such thing.
I have defined, repeatedly, how monogamy, regardless of spelling, is a key-component in defending we Gays from the asymmetrical warfare waged against us. Now, this is important, pay attention: in the rural areas, a Gay's "one and only" often comes from the cities, not always but often. What they know of that individual is what they are told. And oftentimes that individual is living a double-life, cowering behind a woman in a closet of deception, lying and cheating; when they are 'done' with their same-sex "encounter," they return to their closet-of-deception, cowering behind their 'woman.' The lies they told their "straight friends," are the lies they told their "gay friend(s)." Perhaps different words, different types of excuses, but lies nonetheless.
Rural Gays are often accused of "seducing married men." The reverse is usually the case. Further, the liar and cheater, when their closet-of-deception is 'stripped-away,' they make themselves-out as being "victims of their sexuality." Even if they become involved in a same-sex relationship, after they are divorced by the woman and kids they always lied to, they are not 'gay,' they are Bi-sexual. These are Bi-sexual issues, not 'gay-issues.' Gays were lied to, just like 'straights' (Str8s). And after the liar "comes out," they are still Bi-sexual, not Gay, and once the figurative daylight illuminates their dark deceptive closet and they 'confess,' they are not proving any form of "integrity," they only prove they never had any integrity whatsoever.
Meanwhile, the Rural Gay they lied to, monogamous, is told by their "love" that they are the "one and only," and trusting in that love, become POSITIVE, not just for STDs, but all the stresses and neurosis that goes-along with deception, including higher rates of drug and alcohol abuse and trauma. The Str8 women and family experience similar outcomes. That is the only "gay equality" most of the world knows.
That makes Gays more VULNERABLE, to stereotyping and bullying and gay-bashing and discrimination in employment, housing and finance.
The non-monogamous stood before G*d and Country, friends and family, and made a promise and a commitment. They lied to Church too, see. Gays didn't. We did no such thing. We need protections from the non-monogamous, from Bi-sexuals, from liars from cheaters, just like Str8-spouses, male or female.
Further, the non-monogamous, after proving to have developed only ONE real 'discipline,' i.e., lying and cheating, take that to work with them as well. They are the first to make-up an excuse on-the-fly; the first to take credit for someone else's accomplishments, the first to blame another, the first to ridicule and scorn in the pathetic attempt at making themselves-out as being "superior/supreme." They are so 'good' at it, they often rise-above their colleagues, having a lifetime of 'practice' in their closets-of-deception cowering behind women. This is why Commanding Officers are oftentimes dismissed if it becomes known they are engaged in affairs, because they proved lack of discipline in not upholding their commitments; they oftentimes abused their co-workers and employers making excuses (lies) and therefore deceiving colleagues and staff. Not always, but usually. Not every single one of 'em, but most. This is also why I was against the decision about a Lesbian who had an affair with a married 'str8-woman' that was in the news several years ago. I consider it to be a situation of "aiding and abetting the perpetration of lying and cheating while in uniform."
We need protections from such peoples' behaviors as that. They have their own unique problem-sets they chose. They had a choice. We did not. They need their own forms of 'services' and their own forms of 'outreach' and their own forms of 'counseling' and their own forms of 'defense,' but whatever that may be, it's not us. And they must stop hiding behind the GAY LABEL as their excuse, for every time there is such an incident, another hundred Gays and Lesbians are hated-out of equality.
Shalom and Amen.
Kind regards, always,
CLAYTON LEON WINTON citizen#C03183395
1818 E. 16th Ave., Spokane, WA 99203
(end: 09:20PDT)
---------------------------------------
(1st effort to correct typos and spelling-errors, begin Thu Shevat 16, 5775 08:41PDT)
(My opinion is that if anybody reads my quickly-typed, freely-expressed thoughts, I trust their education-level to be sufficient to figure-out typos/spelling-errors without judgements, for unlike others, I do not think faking 'perfect' by using computer-enhanced software proves intelligence at all, just how fake a person truly is. Spell/typo 'corrections' complete at Thu Shevat 16, 5775 08:48PDT, total time: 7-mins; as for syntax, I didn't bother as same concept is applicable, as always)
---------------------------------------
A brief word about spelling:
1) I usually spell "monogamy" as "monogomy," because it does not include "game" at the end of it, as relationships are not "gamey" (wild) and/or have nothing to do with playing games except to the immature. It's my personal preference.
2) I usually spell "lie" in the plural as "lieing", which is technically "incorrect." It should be "lying," but when translated, it is transliterated as "to lay on the ground." A "lie" is an untruth, not a "nap."
3) Words that I do not think of, or use often, I misspell/mistype frequently. For example, the word that sounds like "onohmonopia" is not one I type/say very often and as a result, I spell/type it a number of different ways. The obvious intent is: (if I can think of the correct spelling or find it somewhere) "anomateopia" ?? okay, wrong, I'll look it up. Here: on·o·mat·o·poe·ia
No comments:
Post a Comment